Wikipedia reliable source.

Answer 12 days ago Reliability of Wikipedia compared to other academic research sources Wikipedia is often considered less reliable than other academic research sources due to the following reasons: Open editing: Wikipedia allows anyone to edit and contribute to its articles.Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileOral sex. Oral sex, sometimes referred to as oral intercourse, is sexual activity involving the stimulation of the genitalia of a person by another person using the mouth (including the lips, tongue or teeth) or throat.LOCUST GROVE, Georgia — As part of President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, a key pillar of Bidenomics, White House Infrastructure Implementation …About us. The demand for good-quality statistical data continues to increase. Timely and reliable statistics are key inputs to the broad development strategy. Improvements in the quality and quantity of data on all aspects of development are essential if we are to achieve the goal of a world without poverty.

Yes, Wikipedia strongly prefers independent, reliable sources as the "Wikipedia:Reliable sources" policy page goes into great detail about. But in certain cases, using the person themselves as a source is fine. In the section "Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves", the policy lists 5 criteria that should …According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ...

There’s some disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source. Because it can be edited by anyone, many people argue that it’s easy for misleading information to be added to an article without the reader knowing. Others argue that because Wikipedia articles cite their sources, and because they are worked on by so ...

1. How do the brow ridge, cranial ridge, brain case size and forehead size compare between the skulls of Australopithecus afarensis, Homo erectu s and H. sapiens in the photos below? Use general observations. Australopithecus afarensis Homo erectus Homo sapiens 2. Figures 8.88, 8.89, and 8.90 in the Lab Atlas show a cat skull; figures 9.12, 9.13, 9.14, and 9.15 show a human skull (Images also ...The short answer is yes, you can . . . but you probably shouldn't. Instead, try to find the original source from where the Wikipedia contributor got their information by looking for in-article citations. If you can find a source, it's a good idea to cite that instead, especially if it's a primary source. If there's no citation, it's time to do ...Citing the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This is because much of the database content in IMDb is contributed by users, not by experts. Plus, the editorial oversight by IMDb staff is minimal and not stated on the site ... 1 Wikipedia policy. 35 comments. 2 Calendar. 28 comments. 3 External links modified. 1 comment ...

Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.Sourcing for all other types of content – …

Wikipedia covers a huge range of subjects, but as anybody can add or change ... They are a reliable source of information, having been written by authors ...

As a university student, you are expected to use credible sources in your assessments and course work. A credible source is one that is written by someone who is an expert in their discipline and is free of errors and bias. This guide explains the difference between credible, scholarly and peer-reviewed sources.Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case). Explain Wikipedia’s history and operations, and how these features can influence the site’s contents. Articulate the appropriate uses of Wikipedia. Participate in Wikipedia as an editor, creator and curator of original content. The Least Reliable Source, Or Is It? Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone.Deprecation is not a blanket retroactive "ban" on using the source in absolutely every situation, contrary to what has been reported in media headlines. In particular, reliability always depends on the specific content being cited, and all sources are reliable in at least some circumstances and unreliable in at least some others.Citations to deprecated …JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most …If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it. Guidelines for sourcing, which include external links used as citations, are discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ...

The system, called SIDE, was created by Fabio Petroni and his colleagues at Samaya AI, a London-based company. It was described in a study published in Nature …Oct 16, 2023 · The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ... Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources.Because they are not wikipedia reliable sources. It's just ethnic boosterism. Mohummy 01:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Reply Stars of Science is an initiative and a program by the "Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development" and "Education City". Their flagship project is "Education City" of which, "Academic Bridge Program, …

The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ...Wikipedia, free Internet-based encyclopedia, started in 2001, that operates under an open-source management style. It is overseen by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation and is one of the most-visited sites on the Internet. It uses a collaborative software known as wiki for editing articles.

Ahead of a September keynote at IntelliSys 2021, we spoke to Professor Bruckman, a Harvard grad who holds a PhD from the MIT Media Lab, about how to test assumptions—and the definition of truth and...Jasper Jackson. Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”. The ...WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources. Guideline WP:MEDRS suggests sources for medical text, but other subjects need recommendations for reliable sources, as well.12 abr 2021 ... On March 27, Wikipedia released a new survey revealing that most teachers endorse Wikipedia as the most reliable source.A More Reliable Wikipedia Could Come from AI Research Assistants A neural network can identify Wikipedia references that are unlikely to support an article’s …It is a free reference website that offers full-text versions of classic literary works by hundreds of authors. It is also a news aggregator, offering articles from a large collection of periodicals containing over four million articles dating back to 1984. Newly published articles are added to the site daily.

This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may not be suitable for certain uses depending on the situation.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The largest extant species of bird measured by mass is the common ostrich ( Struthio camelus ), closely followed by the Somali ostrich ( Struthio molybdophanes ).

There are three citations from reliable sources, including two from Disney, that state it will be aired on October 18, 2009. TV Guide, another reliable source, supports this. That is why October 18 is used in the article. YouTube is not a reliable source so it can't be used to support an earlier airdate, especially since the airdate isn't ...Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared against the qualities editors ... From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The largest extant species of bird measured by mass is the common ostrich ( Struthio camelus ), closely followed by the Somali ostrich ( Struthio molybdophanes ).Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.Sourcing for all other types of content – …Wikipedia, free Internet-based encyclopedia, started in 2001, that operates under an open-source management style. It is overseen by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation and is one of the most-visited sites on the Internet. It uses a collaborative software known as wiki for editing articles.Wikipedia claims that “there are concerns regarding whether the documents are genuine or tampered.” In fact, WikiLeaks has a 100 percent track record for publishing accurate documents. This is not disputed by any reliable source. Wikipedia does not consider WikiLeaks to be reliable source, despite its track record of 100 percent accuracyThe idea that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for having an edit button is ridiculous. A button that is rarely used, and a button that when used incorrectly is often corrected in a quick and ...If you’re looking for a reliable source of news and information, MSNBC is a great choice. With its wide range of coverage, from politics to entertainment, MSNBC has something for everyone. But how do you access the channel on your computer?...About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Search. Search. Create account; Log in; Personal tools. Create account; Log in; Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1 Article cleanup: so far and plan. 13 comments. 2 …To check if a specific "blog" counts as a reliable source for your purposes, refer to these pages. These are excerpts from the April 13th, 2009 versions, for convenience: Wikipedia:BLP#Reliable sources; Reliable sources Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully.Still, a review of 110 studies published in 2014 concluded “Wikipedia is generally a reliable source of information” across almost all domains studied.For sources pertaining primarily or specifically to Christian music of all genres, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources . For sources that deal with South Korean culture, including K-pop and other forms of Korean music, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources . For sources that focus on Latin music and its subgenres, see ...

An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has up an article chatting with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. Wales views the Wikipedia site as an educational resource, and apparently thinks teachers who downplay the site are 'bad educators'. '[A] perceived lack of authority ... has drawn criticism from other ...For those preparing for retirement or who’ve already retired, a reverse mortgage is a potentially reliable source of long-term income. With a reverse mortgage, you tap your home’s equity and receive payments from a lender, all without havin...10 abr 2011 ... Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, ...Instagram:https://instagram. iam firstpierre russellkwotryst san jose The following tips will help you tell a good source from one that’s biased, outdated, or inaccurate: 1. Check the domain name. Look at the three letters at the end of the site’s domain name, such as “edu” (educational), “gov” (government), “org” (nonprofit), and “com” (commercial). Generally, .edu and .gov websites are ...Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. ku financial aid disbursement dates 20222018 ford f 150 fuse box diagram While Wikipedia is a valuable resource, it is not infallible, and this is where the significance of referring to original sources cited in the footnotes comes into play. …Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created by the Wikimedia Foundation. Like other encyclopedias, Wikipedia can provide valuable information about certain topics. However, unlike encyclopedias, Wikipedia pages can be edited by anyone, which means that sometimes the information stated is not reliable and is edited for the sake of making a … macc degree programs Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing with the original sources provided in …If it is demonstrably true that all later reliable sources depend on de Stein d'Altenstein, we could say so, This doesn't include Medlands, because Medlands is not in Wikipedia terms a reliable source. If it isn't demonstrably true, we can't say it, and to send emails to try to verify it either way would be original research and completely useless.